Let us being again. To take some examples: why should literature still designate that which already breaks away from literatureaway from what has always been conceived and signified under that nameor that which, not merely escaping literature, implacably destroys it? (Posed in these terms, the question would already be caught in the assurance of a certain fore-knowledge: can what has always been conceived and signified under that name be considered fundamentally homogeneous, univocal, or nonconflictual?) To take other examples: what historical and strategic function should henceforth be assigned to the quotation marks, whether visible or invisible, which transform this into a book, or which still make the deconstruction of philosophy into a philosophical discourse?

About This Quote

Themes

  • Philosophy — Deep thoughts on existence, knowledge, and the nature of reality

More quotes by Jacques Derrida, Dissemination

Related Quotes