The word consciousness, it seems to me, can only refer to what one might define provisionally as the knowing that cannot know itself without intermediary and that cannot function in experience (of which it is an indispensable component) except negatively.To the question What is consciousness, then, a low level provisional answer might be It is the pure subjective or It is the bare knowing of what it is not that constitutes (orders) experience and allows it being. It must be added that, when consciousness is, it seems to be individualized by what it knows. But on another (higher) level the is in the question has still to be questioned, and so the low-level (and logical) answer is only a conventional makeshift, a conventional view, nothing more. And this qualification applies not only to logically inductive and deductive statements necessitating use of the word is, but also to descriptive statements that appear in logical form, using that term, or any equivalent.
About This Quote
About Nanamoli Thera
Nanamoli Thera.